The 2025 RFP/Tender Intelligence Report
Can ChatGPT-5 handle real RFPs?
After testing 110 construction RFPs averaging 1,200 pages, the results were clear - it can’t.
This report reveals where ChatGPT-5 breaks, why accuracy collapses at scale, and how that can prevent RFP bidders from winning projects
Download
Whitepaper visual
Key Findings
Results from our controlled comparison of ContraVault AI and ChatGPT-5 across 110 construction RFPs.
Each metric reflects SME-verified scoring on accuracy, completeness, and traceability.
93.7%
of ContraVault AI's answers were fully accurate and traceable.
Can your review process say the same?
2.3×
higher overall accuracy than a general LLM on the same tenders.
How does your AI stack up?
22 of 24
critical RFP questions answered more completely by ContraVault AI.
Would you bet a bid on the remaining two?
Want to see how ContraVault AI outperformed general AI across 1,000-page RFPs?
Download Benchmark Report
Why ChatGPT-5 isn’t built for RFPs?
Every bid begins with an RFP. Accuracy, compliance, and profitability all depend on how precisely your team interprets hundreds of clauses.

ChatGPT, however, wasn’t designed for this complexity. It summarizes instead of verifies, loses accuracy beyond 100 pages, and often provides untraceable responses.

When a single misread clause can alter margins or invite compliance risk, “almost right” simply isn’t good enough.
Learn More
Visual representation
See Your RFP ROI in Real Numbers
Find out how much time, cost, and risk you could save by automating clause-level analysis.
Calculate My ROI

Turn complexity into clarity

One place to review, search, and draft—so you don't lose days in PDFs, email threads, and contradictory notes.

Request Demo